Thursday, March 26, 2009

Do you agree that Mr Levey had no right to declare an ideology in the name of an angel who doesn't exist.?

Mr Levey has established the church of satan and declared an ideology in the name of an angel called satan who does not actually exist and who never declared an ideology. God wrote all religious and a supposed angel such as the devil, satan never wrote anything.. It is known that God invented all things on this earth and that such an angel never had any power. It is known that God has shared his power with the state and capitalism and that a supposed angel called the devil never had any power. The devil, satan is only mentioned a few times in the Bible and does not actually exist.





If there could be an angel who does object to God then you would have to ask God%26#039;s permission to be a friend of such an angel. I am prepared to have an open debate about this, as it is necessary to have an angel who is independent of God, as God is a military-parmilitary mind and I can%26#039;t work with God myself.
Do you agree that Mr Levey had no right to declare an ideology in the name of an angel who doesn%26#039;t exist.?
I dont get it...





God exists but Satan doesnt? So youre just a %26quot;little%26quot; blinded by faith and ignorance? You will believe in a God. But not in his counterpart which has just as much credence in tenet?





I thought the serpent in the garden, Lucifer, and other such nouns and pronouns were all indicative of the same person - the devil. Its in scripture, but you dont believe it? What kind of Christian are you?





How many times must something be mentioned in scripture for it to become %26quot;real%26quot;? The fact that Satan was %26quot;only mentioned a few times%26quot; means that is must be bogus? So what is the magical number count for tenet to go from a lie to a truth?





Furthermore, you make a few ridiculous presumptions that beg for proof. %26quot;God has shared his power with the state and capitalism.%26quot; I must have missed that verse... was that mentioned in Peter?





You cant believe in the devil without believing in God too. You cant hate god without believing in him. So, no one will worship or befriend the devil... unless they were evil to begin with. They wont ask for Gods permission to befriend the devil... because if they care what God things they wouldnt befriend the devil by choice, not because they werent given permission.





An angel that doesnt exist would be %26quot;Bob%26quot; or %26quot;Jerry%26quot;. No, Lucifer was quite explicitly named in theology.





And I cant believe I wasted all this time writing a detailed answer to someone with such a backward and twisted brain. It surprising your even alive, because that chunk of lard in your skull died a long time ago. Your question doesnt make sense no matte what you believe or what your opinions are... the thoughts simply dont flow.
Do you agree that Mr Levey had no right to declare an ideology in the name of an angel who doesn%26#039;t exist.?
Yes you are absolutely right.
Reply:You can%26#039;t have an open debate about this because you are making assertions that can%26#039;t be proven. Yes, we can theorize all the angels we want, but does it make any difference. I don%26#039;t know your belief system wheter you are a Christian, Muslim, Jew, or Agnostic. So I don%26#039;t have a clue about your mind set.

No comments:

Post a Comment